- Infrastructure
- Transport
- Aviation
- Aviation
- Aviation White Paper
- Aviation Legislation
- Australian Airspace Policy
- Airports
- International Aviation
- Middle East Air Services Negotiations
- Australia - United States 'Open Skies' Agreement
- Air Carriers' Liability
- International Air Services Information Memorandum
- Charter Guidelines
- International Airline Licences
- Family Assistance Code
- Timetable Summary
- Register of Available Capacity
- International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
- Universal Safety Oversight Audit Program
- International Airservices Commission (IASC)
- Asia Pacific Consultative Link (APCL)
- Regional Aviation
- General Aviation
- Environmental Issues
- Aviation Safety
- Aviation Security
- Aviation Transport Programs
- Research & Statistics
- Aviation Access Working Group (AAWG)
- Aviation Publications
- Aerodrome Rescue and Fire Fighting Services (ARFFS)
- Roads
- Roads
- Nation Building Program
- Road Transport & Vehicles Legislation
- Roads, Highways & Freeways
- Motor Vehicles, Trailers & Bicycles
- Passengers, Freight & Bulk Goods
- Vehicles & The Environment
- Road Safety
- Vehicle Regulation
- Road Security
- Research & Statistics
- Roads Publications
- Review of the F3 to M7 Corridor Selection
- Rail
- Maritime
- Maritime
- International Shipping
- Liability and Compensation for Maritime Incidents
- Principles of Liability Limitation
- General Maritime Claims
- Claims for Pollution Damage Caused by Oil From Oil Tankers
- Claims for Damage Caused by Fuel Oil
- Claims for Damage Caused by Hazardous and Noxious Substances
- Claims for Passenger Injury and Damage to Luggage
- Claims for Damage Arising out of Wreck Removal
- Coastal Shipping
- Maritime Safety
- National Maritime Safety Regulator
- Maritime Security
- Offshore Oil & Gas Security
- Maritime Transport Programs
- Research & Statistics
- Maritime Related Guide to Australian Government
- Environment Protection
- Maritime Publications
- Regional
- Local Government
- Local Government
- Regional and Local Community Infrastructure Program
- $25 million Local Government Reform Fund
- Australian Council of Local Government (ACLG)
- Local Government & Planning Ministers' Council (LGPMC)
- Year of Women in Local Government 2010
- Financial Assistance Grants
- Supplementary funding to South Australian councils for local roads
- National Awards for Local Government
- Development Assessment Forum
- Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government
- Local Government Publications
- The Department
- The Department
- About The Department
- Career Opportunities
- Annual Reports
- Budget & Portfolio Additional Estimates Statements
- Media Centre
- Senate Order on Government Agency Contracts
- Freedom of Information
- Tenders
- Indexed List of Departmental Files
- Grants Reporting Requirements
- Departmental Publications
Crash-based Evaluation of Australian Design Rule 69 (Full Frontal Impact Occupant Protection)
Summary
In-depth data at MUARC was used to evaluate Australian Design Rule 69 (ADR 69), Full Frontal Impact Occupant Protection, with respect to both injury risk and cost of injury for drivers of passenger cars. The effectiveness of frontal airbag deployment was also examined. ADR 69 was introduced in Australia in mid-1995 and was based largely on the US occupant protection standard, FMVSS 208. The results of this evaluation indicate reductions of 80% and higher in the likelihood of sustaining AIS 2+ head and face injuries, with even greater gains associated with frontal driver airbag deployment. The frontal driver airbag was particularly important in reducing the probability of chest injuries. The average injury cost savings for drivers of post-ADR 69 manufactured passenger cars was found to be as high as AUD$19,000 depending on the body region, while the combined injury cost saving associated with head, face, neck and chest injuries combined was AUD$27,000 on average per driver. The findings do however point the way forward for improvements in vehicle safety design for the further protection of the spine and the lower extremity in particular, where the regulation has had little impact among this sample of belted drivers. Limitations of this research and implications of these findings are discussed. Recommendations to build on the success of ADR 69 are made.Download Complete Document: Grant_Report200603 [
PDF: 1559Kb]
Type: Research and Analysis Report
Sub-Type: Grant
Author(s): Michael Fitzharris, Brian Fildes, Stuart Newstead, David Logan, Monash University Accident Research Centre
Publication Date: 15/12/06
ISBN: 0 642 25557 1





