- Infrastructure
- Transport
- Transport
- Nation Building Program
- Transport in Australia
- Transport Security
- Information for Australian Travellers
- Aviation Security
- Air Cargo Security
- Maritime Security
- Offshore Oil & Gas Security
- Surface Transport Security
- Office of the Inspector of Transport Security
- Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP)
- Legislation, Regulations and Codes
- Useful Links
- Contact the Office of Transport Security
- TravelSECURE
- Transport Programs
- Freight Logistics
- Transport Statistics
- Transport Publications
- Aviation
- Aviation
- Aviation White Paper
- Aviation Legislation
- Australian Airspace Policy
- Airports
- Air Cargo
- International Aviation
- Air Carriers' Liability
- International Air Services Information Memorandum
- Charter Guidelines
- International Airline Licences
- Family Assistance Code
- Timetable Summary
- Register of Available Capacity
- International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
- Universal Safety Oversight Audit Program
- International Airservices Commission (IASC)
- Asia Pacific Consultative Link (APCL)
- Regional Aviation
- General Aviation
- Environmental Issues
- Aviation Safety
- Aviation Security
- Aviation Transport Programs
- Research & Statistics
- Aviation Access Working Group (AAWG)
- Aviation Publications
- Aerodrome Rescue and Fire Fighting Services (ARFFS)
- Roads
- Roads
- Nation Building Program
- Road Transport & Vehicles Legislation
- Roads, Highways & Freeways
- Motor Vehicles, Trailers & Bicycles
- Passengers, Freight & Bulk Goods
- Vehicles & The Environment
- Road Safety
- Vehicle Regulation
- Road Security
- Research & Statistics
- Roads Publications
- Review of the F3 to M7 Corridor Selection
- Rail
- Maritime
- Maritime
- Discussion Paper: Re-write of the Navigation Act 1912
- International Shipping
- Liability and Compensation for Maritime Incidents
- Principles of Liability Limitation
- General Maritime Claims
- Claims for Pollution Damage Caused by Oil From Oil Tankers
- Claims for Damage Caused by Fuel Oil
- Claims for Damage Caused by Hazardous and Noxious Substances
- Claims for Passenger Injury and Damage to Luggage
- Claims for Damage Arising out of Wreck Removal
- Coastal Shipping
- Maritime Safety
- National Maritime Safety Regulator
- Maritime Security
- Offshore Oil & Gas Security
- Maritime Transport Programs
- Research & Statistics
- Maritime Related Guide to Australian Government
- Environment Protection
- Maritime Publications
- Regional
- Local Government
- Local Government
- Regional and Local Community Infrastructure Program
- Local Government Reform Fund
- Australian Council of Local Government (ACLG)
- Local Government & Planning Ministers' Council (LGPMC)
- Year of Women in Local Government 2010
- Financial Assistance Grants
- Supplementary funding to South Australian councils for local roads
- National Awards for Local Government
- Development Assessment Forum
- Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government
- Local Government Publications
- The Department
- The Department
- About The Department
- Career Opportunities
- Annual Reports
- Budget & Portfolio Additional Estimates Statements
- Media Centre
- Senate Order on Government Agency Contracts
- Freedom of Information
- Tenders
- Indexed List of Departmental Files
- Grants Reporting Requirements
- Departmental Publications
Summary
In this report, bicycle helmet efficacy is quantified using a formal meta-analytic approach based on peer-reviewed studies. Though several reviews have already been published advocating the use of helmets, this approach provides summary estimates of efficacy in terms of head injury, brain injury and facial injury based on studies of cyclists involved in crashes in which injury and helmet information is available for each individual. It also provides evidence concerning neck injury and fatal injury. These topics have only been partially addressed previously due to the small numbers of cases involved.
The results are based on studies conducted in Australia, the USA, Canada and the United Kingdom, published in the epidemiological and public health literature in the period 1987- 1998. The summary odds ratio estimate for efficacy is 0.40 (95% confidence interval 0.29, 0.55) for head injury, 0.42 (0.26, 0.67) for brain injury, 0.53 (0.39, 0.73) for facial injury and 0.27 (0.10, 0.71) for fatal injury. This indicates a statistically significant protective effect of helmets. Three studies provided neck injury results that were unfavourable to helmets with a summary estimate of 1.36 (1.00, 1.86), but this result may not be applicable to the lighter helmets currently in use.
In conclusion, the evidence is clear that bicycle helmets prevent serious injury and even death. Despite this, the use of helmets is sub-optimal. Helmet use for all riders should be further encouraged to the extent that it is uniformly accepted.
Download Complete Document: Bic_Crash_5 [
PDF: 118Kb]
Type: Research and Analysis Report
Sub-Type: Consultant Report
Author(s): R Attewell, K Glase, M McFadden
Publication Date: 01/06/00
ISBN: 0 642 25522 9






